Lesson 3 of 4
AI for Account Research

Committee and Stakeholder Briefs

For sellers who have mapped a buying committee and do not know what to say to each person. You leave with a one-page brief template, a source-only drafting prompt, a do-not-guess list and a check across the whole committee.

By Sampath Mallidi, Founder and Chairman · Reviewed by Swetha Arun, Chief Operating Officer · Updated 13 Nov 2026 · 6 min read · Free, no sign-up

What you'll learn

By the end of this lesson you can turn a buying committee map into a one-page stakeholder brief for each person, use an AI assistant to draft it from sources you supply, and mark what you know, what you infer and what you must not guess.

Where the brief sits

The map tells you who is on the committee. The brief tells you what to do with each person. You write it after the map, never before, because you cannot brief someone you have not named.

If you have not built the map yet, start with Mapping the Buying Committee and the free Buying Committee Mapper. The Buying Committee Map template has the nine roles to look for.

The sources come from the lesson before this one: Sources First, Prompts Second. Here the sources are about one person, and the output is a page you can read in two minutes before a call.

What one brief holds

Keep it to one page. If it runs longer, you are writing a profile, and nobody reads a profile before a call.

SectionThe question it answersRule
Role in the decisionWhy does this person matter to the deal?One line, from the map
What they have saidWhat are their own words on this topic?Quote, with source and date
What they probably care aboutWhat might matter to them, given their job?Label it as inference
What to say firstWhat is the one thing worth opening with?Tied to something they said
What not to sayWhat would land badly or wrongly?Anything you cannot source
What we do not knowWhat must we ask?At least two questions

The last two rows do the most work. A brief that lists only what you know teaches you to talk. A brief that lists what you do not know teaches you to ask.

One-person stakeholder brief

One-person stakeholder brief
Account: [company]
Person: [name], [title as of date]
Role in the decision: [economic buyer / technical buyer / user / other]
Last checked: [date]

What they have said (quote, source, date):
1. "[quote]" ([source], [date])
2. "[quote]" ([source], [date])

What they probably care about (inference, not fact):
[one or two lines]

What to say first:
[one sentence tied to a quote above]

What not to say or guess:
[for example: their view of our category, their budget, who they report to]

What we do not know (ask, do not assume):
1. [question]
2. [question]

Collect what the person has said

Use public, professional material about this person and their area:

  • Remarks on a results call or in an interview
  • A conference talk, a webinar or a published article
  • A post on a professional network, in their own words
  • The job posts on their team, which show what they are building
  • Your own notes from earlier conversations, if any

Save each with the link and the date. Stay with their work. Their family, health, home or anything personal does not belong in a brief, and a buyer who sees it in your message will not reply.

If you find nothing, write that down. "No public statements found" is a useful line. It tells you to open with a question, not a point of view.

Draft with the assistant, from your sources

Give the assistant the template, the sources and one strict rule: use only the sources.

Brief-drafting prompt (paste with your sources)

Brief-drafting prompt (paste with your sources)
I am preparing to contact [name], [title] at [company]. Their role in the decision is [role]. I have pasted the sources below, each with a link and a date.

Use only these sources. Do not use anything else you know about this person or company.

Fill in the stakeholder brief template below. Rules:
1. Under "What they have said", use exact quotes only, with the source and date.
2. Put anything you conclude yourself under "What they probably care about" and start it with "Inference:".
3. Under "What not to say or guess", list the things the sources do not support.
4. Under "What we do not know", write the questions I would need answered.
5. If the sources say nothing on a section, write "not in the sources". Do not fill the space.

Template:
[paste the brief template]

Sources:
[paste]

Read the result against the sources before you trust it. Every quote must be findable, the date must be right and the person must still hold the job. The next lesson is a full method for that check.

The do not guess list

Some things look obvious and are not. An assistant will state them smoothly, which is the danger. Keep these out of a brief unless a source says them:

  • What they think of your category or of the supplier they use today
  • Their budget, or whether they hold one
  • Who they report to, and what that person thinks
  • Why they joined, or why they might leave
  • Anything about how they feel

Each of these is a question, not a fact. Put it under "What we do not know". On the call, ask it.

Read the set together

Write a brief for each person you plan to approach, then lay them side by side. Check three things:

  1. Do they agree? The economic buyer, the user and the technical buyer will say different things about the same programme. Note where.
  2. Does each get a different opening? The same message to three people is a mailshot, not a conversation.
  3. Is anyone missing? A seat with no brief is a seat you have not reached. That is your next piece of research.

Update a brief when something changes: a new post, a job move, a reply from someone else on the committee. Put the date at the top. A brief with no date cannot be trusted.

Key takeaways

Key takeaways

  • Write the brief after the map: one page per person, with their own words, an opening line and a list of what you do not know.
  • Give the assistant sources about the person and tell it to use only those. Label every inference.
  • Do not guess motives, budgets, reporting lines or feelings. Turn each into a question.
40 minutes

Exercise (40 minutes)

  1. Pick one Tier 1 account where you have a map with at least three named people. (5 minutes)
  2. Choose the person you will approach first. Collect two to four sources about them, with links and dates. (15 minutes)
  3. Run the brief-drafting prompt. Open each source and check every quote. (15 minutes)
  4. Write the one sentence you would say first, and the two questions you would ask. (5 minutes)
Saved in this browser only.

Why this works on named accounts

A lead list gives you one name per company and a template to send. A named account gives you a committee, and each person on it reads your message for a different reason. A short brief for each of them, built from what they have said in public, is how you avoid sending the same note to three people with three different jobs. It only makes sense for accounts you have chosen. For thirty accounts, a page per person is a few hours of work. For five thousand it is impossible, and that is why volume outreach says the same thing to everyone.
How account-based selling works →

Put it into practice

ToolRuns in your browser

Buying Committee Mapper

Map the people behind a decision by role, stance and influence, and see who to approach next. Runs in your browser.

Template8 min read

Buying Committee Map

For sellers working a large account through a single contact.

You leave with nine roles to look for, a map you can paste into a spreadsheet, a brief for each person and a coverage check that shows where the account is exposed.

AI prompts5 min read

AI Prompts to Personalise by Buying-Committee Role

For sellers who send the same message to every person in an account.

You leave with a fact sheet, 7 prompts, a consistency check and one fact turned into 3 role-specific openings.

AI prompts8 min read

15 AI Prompts for Account Research

For sellers who use Claude, ChatGPT or Perplexity to prepare for an account.

You leave with a set-up prompt, 15 research prompts in working order, a fact check that catches invented details and a sample of its output.

Up next

Want this run on your key accounts?

Tell us which accounts you need to open. We will show you how we would work them.