AI prompts

AI Prompts to Personalise by Buying-Committee Role: AI Sales Personalisation for Named Accounts

For sellers who send the same message to every person in an account.

You leave with a fact sheet, 7 prompts, a consistency check and one fact turned into 3 role-specific openings.

By Intandemly team · Updated 16 Oct 2026 · 5 min read · Free, no sign-up

Preview

On this page

What you'll get

  • 10 copy-ready blocks
  • Spreadsheet-ready
  • 5 min read
  • Account fact sheet (paste at the top of the conversation)
  • Prompt 1: Rules
  • Prompt 2: What the fact means for each role
  • Prompt 3: One question per role
  • Prompt 4: Opening lines
  • Prompt 5: Full short email
  • and 4 more

How to use it

  1. Step 1: Fill in the fact sheet with things you have read and can link to.
  2. Step 2: Run prompt 1 once per account, then prompts 2 to 5 for each role.
  3. Step 3: Run prompts 6 and 7 on everything before you send.
  4. Step 4: Rewrite the result in your own voice. Send one person at a time.

Paste only public information. Do not paste personal details beyond name, title and what the person has said in public about their work.

The same company fact means different things to finance, IT and operations. These prompts take one checked fact and produce a short, role-specific opening for each person, without inventing anything about them.

Part 1: Fact sheet

Account fact sheet (paste at the top of the conversation)

Account fact sheet (paste at the top of the conversation)
Company: [name]
Fact 1: [what changed, with date and link]
Fact 2: [stated priority, exact wording, with source]
Fact 3: [optional]
What we do, in one plain sentence: [ ]
People:
- [Name], [title], likely role in the decision: [ ]
- [Name], [title], likely role in the decision: [ ]
- [Name], [title], likely role in the decision: [ ]

Part 2: Seven prompts

Prompt 1: Rules

Prompt 1: Rules
Use only the fact sheet above. Do not add facts about the company or the people from memory. If you need something that is not there, ask me. Write in plain British English, short sentences, no superlatives, no exclamation marks. Confirm, then wait.

Prompt 2: What the fact means for each role

Prompt 2: What the fact means for each role
For each person on the fact sheet, write two lines: (a) what Fact 1 probably changes in their work this year, (b) the question they are probably being asked by their own boss because of it. Label every line "inference".

Prompt 3: One question per role

Prompt 3: One question per role
For each person, write one question I could ask that only someone in their role could answer, and that they would find worth answering. No question may be answerable from the company's website.

Prompt 4: Opening lines

Prompt 4: Opening lines
For each person, write a two-sentence opening for an email: sentence one states Fact 1 or Fact 2 exactly as given, sentence two links it to their role using the inference from prompt 2, phrased as a possibility, not a claim. Do not mention our product.

Prompt 5: Full short email

Prompt 5: Full short email
For [name], write an email under 90 words: the opening from prompt 4, one sentence on what we do (from the fact sheet, unchanged), the question from prompt 3, and nothing else. Subject line under six words, no punctuation tricks. Give me two versions.

Prompt 6: Fact check

Prompt 6: Fact check
List every factual statement in the emails above. Next to each, write which fact-sheet line it comes from. Mark anything that does not come from the fact sheet as "NOT SOURCED" so I can remove it.

Prompt 7: Consistency across the committee

Prompt 7: Consistency across the committee
Read all the emails as if the recipients forwarded them to each other. Do any two contradict each other, promise different things or describe our company differently? Would any recipient feel a colleague had been approached behind their back? List the problems and suggest the smallest fix for each.

Part 3: Send log

Send log header (paste into a spreadsheet)

Send log header (paste into a spreadsheet)
Account	Person	Role	Fact used	Question asked	Checked by	Sent (date)	Response

Worked example (illustrative, not a real company)

Illustrative example

Quaywise, a warehouse-software seller, runs prompt 4 for three people at "Northfield Logistics". The company, people and fact are invented.

One fact, three openings

ExampleOne fact, three openings
Fact 1: Northfield announced a second distribution centre in March (press release).

Dana Whitfield, VP Supply Chain
"Northfield announced a second distribution centre in March. I imagine that turns planning for one site into planning for two, possibly with a new team."

Marcus Lee, Head of IT Applications
"Northfield announced a second distribution centre in March. That may mean the warehouse system has to serve two sites, and that anything running beside it will come to you for review."

Finance director (name to be confirmed)
"Northfield announced a second distribution centre in March. A second site often means stock held in two places, which may be something finance is being asked to watch."

Prompt 7 flagged one problem: the first draft to Marcus did not mention that Dana had already been contacted. One sentence was added.

Check before you send

  • Every fact in the message is on the fact sheet, with a link I opened.
  • Inferences read as possibilities ("may", "I imagine"), not as knowledge.
  • Nothing refers to the person's private life, photos or non-work posts.
  • Each person's message would survive being forwarded to the others.
  • I have rewritten it in my own voice and read it aloud once.

Why this works on named accounts

Most AI personalisation swaps a name, a job title and a line scraped from a profile into the same pitch. Buyers have learned to spot it in a sentence. Personalising by role is different work: one true fact about the company, read from the point of view of each person it lands on. That only makes sense inside a named account, where you have the fact, know who sits on the buying committee and intend to speak to several of them. The assistant does the rewriting. The fact and the judgement still have to be yours.
How account-based selling works →

Common questions

How do you personalise sales emails with AI?

Give the assistant facts you have checked and ask it to read them from each recipient's role. Do not ask it to find facts about the person; that is where invented details come from.

Is AI personalisation obvious to buyers?

It is when it only swaps a name and a scraped detail into a pitch. A message built on one true company fact and a question fit for the role reads as written by someone who did the work.

Which roles should get their own version?

At least the budget owner, the day-to-day owner and the technical evaluator. Their concerns differ enough that one message cannot serve all three.

More from the Academy

AI prompts9 min read

ChatGPT and Claude Prompts for Writing Cold Emails

For sellers who use ChatGPT or Claude to draft outreach and get emails that sound like everyone else's.

You leave with a set-up prompt, a research block, 10 prompts that draft, cut, criticise and fact-check, and one worked draft.

Script5 min read

Multithreading Email Templates for a Second Stakeholder

For sellers with one contact in a large account and nobody else.

You leave with a who-next card, 6 email templates, a thread log and 2 emails written out.

AI prompts5 min read

AI Prompt Pack: Read an Annual Report in 10 Minutes

For sellers researching a large account before first contact.

You leave with 7 prompts, a 10-minute timetable, a one-page brief format and one brief written out.

Want this run on your key accounts?

Tell us which accounts you need to open. We will show you how we would work them.