Scripts
12 Cold Email Templates for Named Accounts
For anyone writing first-touch email to senior buyers in large companies. You leave with twelve short templates, the research each one needs and a five-point check to run before sending.
On this page
By Intandemly team · Updated 15 Oct 2026 · Free, no sign-up
These templates are for a short list of accounts you have chosen, not for a mass send. Each one is under 110 words, asks for one thing and needs facts you can only get by looking at the company.
How to use it
- Fill in the research inputs first. No inputs, no email.
- Pick the template that matches your reason for writing.
- Replace every bracket with something you can point to. If you would not say it to their face, delete it.
- Run the five-point check at the end.
Research inputs (fill in before writing)
Research inputs
Research inputs
Account: [company]
Person: [name, title, role in the decision]
Trigger or initiative: [what happened, with date and source link]
What it implies for their team: [one line]
Problem we solve, in their words: [one line]
Proof we are allowed to share: [customer type or named case study]
Others in the account: [names or roles; who we have already spoken to]
One question worth asking: [ ]Opening emails
1. Trigger event
Use when something has changed at the company in the last few weeks. Research: the event, its date, a source.
1. Trigger event
Subject: [Trigger, in three or four words]
Hi [First name],
I saw that [company] [trigger, stated plainly]. That usually puts [specific pressure] on [their team].
We help [type of company] with [problem]. I have one question: how are you planning to handle [specific part] over the next two quarters?
If it's useful, I can share how others in [sector] approached it. Worth 20 minutes?
[Your name]2. Published initiative
Use when the company has stated a goal in an annual report, earnings call or interview. Research: the exact wording and where it appeared.
2. Published initiative
Subject: [Initiative name]
Hi [First name],
In [source], [company] said it plans to [initiative, close to their wording]. Your team seems to carry [the part this person owns].
The piece that tends to be harder than expected is [specific obstacle]. That is the part we work on.
Would a short conversation about how you're approaching it be useful?
[Your name]3. New executive
Use in a leader's first months in the role. Research: start date, previous company, what they were hired to do if it is public.
3. New executive
Subject: Your first months at [company]
Hi [First name],
Congratulations on the move to [company]. New leaders in [function] often start by reviewing [area], so I'll keep this short.
We work with [type of company] on [problem]. If [area] is on your list, I can send a one-page view of what peers looked at first.
Would that help, or is it too early?
[Your name]4. Problem you can see from outside
Use when public signals such as job posts, reviews or tools in use point to the problem. Research: the signal itself.
4. Problem you can see from outside
Subject: [Signal, e.g. "the three planning roles you're hiring"]
Hi [First name],
I noticed [signal]. When we see that, it often means [problem] is taking up more of the team's time than anyone wants.
I may be wrong about [company]. If I'm not, we've helped [type of company] with exactly that.
Am I close?
[Your name]Role-specific emails
5. Finance leader
5. Finance leader
Subject: [Cost or risk area] at [company]
Hi [First name],
I'm writing to you, not only to [operating function], because [problem] usually shows up in [finance measure: working capital, cost to serve, audit findings] before anyone names it as a problem.
We help [type of company] with that. I don't have your numbers, so I won't guess at a saving.
Would you be open to 20 minutes on how you measure it today?
[Your name]6. Technical evaluator
6. Technical evaluator
Subject: [Topic]: how it would fit with [their system]
Hi [First name],
If [company] ever looks at [category], your team will be asked whether it fits with [their system or standard]. I'd like to answer that before anyone asks.
Short version: [one factual line on integration, security or deployment].
Can I send the technical summary, or is there someone on your team who would rather review it?
[Your name]7. Head of the team that would use it
7. Head of the team that would use it
Subject: [Daily problem, in their terms]
Hi [First name],
Your team lives with [daily problem] more than anyone at [company]. I'd like to understand how it works today before I say anything about what we do.
Two questions: where does [process] slow down most, and who feels it first?
Glad to share what similar teams changed, if that's useful.
[Your name]Multithreading emails
8. Referred by a colleague
Use only after a real conversation, and only when your contact has agreed.
8. Referred by a colleague
Subject: [Colleague's name] suggested I write
Hi [First name],
I spoke with [colleague] on [day] about [topic]. They said [the part that concerns this person] sits with you and that you'd have a view.
My question is [specific question]. Could we speak for 15 minutes this week, so that what we discuss with [colleague] fits how your team works?
[Your name]9. Second stakeholder, no introduction yet
Use when you are already writing to others in the account. Be open about it.
9. Second stakeholder, no introduction yet
Subject: [Topic] at [company]
Hi [First name],
To be transparent, I've also written to [name or role] about [topic]. A decision like this rarely sits with one person, and I didn't want [their function] to hear about it second-hand.
From your side the question is usually [their concern]. How does [company] look at that today?
[Your name]Proof and follow-up
10. Sharing a case study without pitching
Use a customer you have permission to name, or describe the type of company.
10. Sharing a case study without pitching
Subject: How [customer or type of company] handled [problem]
Hi [First name],
No ask in this one. [Customer or type of company] had [situation similar to theirs]. They changed [what they did], and the result was [outcome, only as published].
The part that might apply to [company] is [specific parallel].
The full write-up is here: [link]. If you'd like the detail behind it, tell me.
[Your name]11. Follow-up that adds something
Send three to five working days after no reply. Never send "just bumping this".
11. Follow-up that adds something
Subject: Re: [original subject]
Hi [First name],
One thing I should have included: [new fact, source or observation about their company].
It made me think [one-line implication]. Does that match what you're seeing?
[Your name]12. Closing the loop
Send after your last planned touch.
12. Closing the loop
Subject: Re: [original subject]
Hi [First name],
I've written a few times and don't want to keep landing in your inbox if the timing is wrong.
I'll stop here. If [problem] moves up the list, or if someone else at [company] is the better person to speak to, a one-line reply is all I need.
Thanks for reading.
[Your name]Five-point check before you send
- Could this email be sent to another company without changes? If yes, rewrite it.
- Is every claim about their company true, and can I show where I found it?
- Is there exactly one question or one ask?
- Is it under 110 words and readable on a phone?
- Does it give an honest way to say no, and do I meet the email rules for their country (identify yourself, honour opt-outs)?
Why this works better on named accounts
A template is a structure. The research you put into the brackets is the email. Sent to a bought list, these twelve read like every other sequence in the inbox, because the brackets get filled with a first name and a company name. Aimed at a named account they do a different job: each email goes to a specific role in the buying committee, refers to something true about that company this quarter and builds on what you learned from the last person you spoke to there. Templates 8 and 9 only exist on an account list, because they depend on knowing who else is involved.
How account-based selling works →More from the Academy
AI prompts
15 AI Prompts for Account Research
For sellers who use Claude, ChatGPT or Perplexity to prepare for an account. You leave with a set-up prompt, fifteen research prompts in working order and a fact-check prompt that catches invented details.
Get it free →ScriptsLinkedIn Connection Request Messages by Buyer Role
For sellers connecting with several people inside the same company. You leave with twelve connection notes for six buyer roles, three messages for after they accept and a short list of things never to send.
Get it free →